Saturday, May 20, 2006

I really like Gayle's idea that intimacy is life - and I totally agree. It truly is how we relate, and how deeply we relate to those in our life that define us. I was a little baffled about how the narrator could live so many years and have sex with so many women and not be touched by any of them. It sits in striking contrast to Ashima in "The Namesake" - Ashima has spent her whole life in such close proximity to her family - nuclear and extended, that when she moves to Boston with her husband you can see the culture and family that she is missing like an open wound. Especially when she comes home from the hospital and is faced with the mountain of work in her home, and has no clue how to go about navigating in this new role without the culture of family that she has always known.

I think this resonated with me personally for a couple of reasons. With my fist child, I had moved to Japan with my husband 6 weeks prior to her birth. I was new to the Japanese culture and also new to the military culture. Like Ashima, I had no clue how to go about accessing help in a foreign country and foreign culture. Trying to care for a newborn is trying enough, but with my family and friends literally on the other side of the world, and my husband in Thailand (he had to go for about 2 weeks when she was a week old), I was ready to call it quits and sell the child to gypsies.

I also loved how they built such an extended "family" amoung the fellow bengali's over the years, which suited their emotional needs at home, but really meant nothing to their children. Even when Gogol married within this family, there was such an emotional guff that the marriage really had a fantastic foundation, but nowhere to go.

Overall, I really think I identified much more with Ashima than with anyone else (and I would have really liked more about Sonia, but I guess she was peripheral to the namesake-thing). Families are so spread all over the country/world these days (our reading group is such a perfect example!), that trying to incorporate into your children a sense of where they come from is so hard.

I know this is disjointed, but I've been trying to compile it over a few weeks - I've no time to proofread! I would love to hear what yal thought about the characters and some of their choices.

3 Comments:

Blogger AMQ said...

Nice segue into The Namesake!

I also really liked Ashima and how she built her family of Bengalis to replace the one she left behind. It was interesting in the end that her ties to America were as strong as those in India.

Ashima's connections with are in contrast with Nikhil, who fails in his relationships. He just couldn't connect...not with family, or lovers or even his wife. This seems to have a lot to do with Dad...and somebody's bugging me now, so I will post more later!

4:51 PM  
Blogger KK said...

I could really relate to Gogol's feelings of separation from his parents - and in my case the distance is simply generational.

I also find it interesting and perplexing that in our country so many facets of people have melded together - race, ethnicity, etc. At some point it won't even make since to ask people to categorize themselves. My hair dresser made me laugh when she told me that she recently discovered to her astonishment that her birth certificate says she's black. Her mother is hispanic, her father creole with a black grandparent. How much does the category matter? What does it even mean? It seems open to new/evolving definitions.
I will stop rambling and write something thoughtful in a post.

5:05 PM  
Blogger jen said...

I agree that it would have been interesting to know mnore about Sonia's journey as well.

10:17 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home